Is this the smoking gun to Melanoma and the reoccurrence the plasticity of the Macrophages?..Jim Breitfeller

Is this the smoking gun to Melanoma and the reoccurrence the plasticity of the Macrophages? The (TAM) Tumor Associated Macrophage or more precisely M2-Like Phenotype.
In my search for answers, I have been focusing in on how the tumor escapes detection by the immune system. We need to know what is going on in vivo during the different stages of melanoma.

The tumor mass is undoubtedly a multifaceted show, where different cell types, including neoplastic cells, fibroblasts, endothelial, and immune-competent cells, interact with one another continuously. Macrophages represent up to 50% of the tumor mass, and they certainly operate as fundamental actors. Macrophages constitute an extremely heterogeneous population; they originate from blood monocytes, which differentiate into distinct macrophage types, schematically identified as M1 (or classically activated) and M2 (or alternatively activated).

It is now generally accepted that TAMs have an M2 phenotype and show mostly pro-tumoral functions, promoting tumor cell survival, proliferation, and dissemination. High levels of TAM are often, although not always, correlated with a bad prognosis, and recent studies have also highlighted a link between their abundance and the process of metastasis.

In a recent research paper “Immunotype and Immunohistologic Characteristics of Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cells are Associated with Clinical Outcome in Metastatic Melanoma”1 et al Slingluff 2012, it breaks down the Immunohistologic Characteristics into three distinct immunotypes:

A) No infiltration of immune cells in the tumor’s microenvironment.

B) Infiltrating Immune cells only in close proximity to the tumor’s vascular system

C) Diffuse immune cell infiltrates throughout a metastatic tumor and its microenvironment.

Immunohistologic Characteristics of Tumor Infiltrating Immune Cells


Overall, the most predominant immune cells were T cells (53%), followed by the B cell lineage cells (33%), and then by macrophages (13%), with NK and mature dendritic cells only hardly present.

With the setting of the tumor’s microenvironment evaluated, we will focus the low survival immunotype A patients.

How can we improve the overall survival and the immune response to Melanoma? We need to push the differentiation of the macrophages towards the M1 phenotype.

Macrophages are important tumor-infiltrating cells and play pivotal roles in tumor growth and metastasis. Macrophages participate in immune responses to tumors in a polarized manner: classic M1 macrophages produce interleukin (IL) 12 to promote tumoricidal responses, whereas M2 macrophages and M2-Like produce IL10 and help tumor progression. The mechanisms governing macrophage polarization are unclear but in 1990 it was discovered treatment of M2 macrophages with GM-CSF or IFN-gamma led to production of M1 phenotypic markers upon LPS stimulation. It also has been seen that if you block the IL-10 receptor with an antibody along with LPS (TLR4 agonist) stimulation or CpG (TLR9 agonist) stimulation you shift the Macrophage plasticity towards the M1 phenotype.

So what causes the high Macrophage (M2) to migrate towards the Tumor and its microenvironment? Does the tumor somehow recruit these (TAMs) Tumor Associated Macrophages? What are the characteristics of the M2 phenotype?

Hallmarks of M2 macrophages are IL-10high IL-12low IL-1rahigh IL-1 decoyRhigh production, CCL17 and CCL22 secretion, high expression of mannose, scavenger and galactose-type receptors, poor antigen-presenting capability and wound-healing promotion.

CCL17 and CCL22 chemokines within tumor microenvironment are related to infiltration of regulatory T cells in Macrophage 2 in melanoma. Early Detection of Tumor Cells by Innate Immune Cells leads to Treg Recruitment through CCL22 Production by Tumor Cells and Tumor Assocated Marophages (TAMs). It has been suggested that at early times during tumorigenesis, the detection of tumor cells by innate effectors (monocytes and NK cells) imposes a selection for CCL22 secretion that recruits Treg to evade this early antitumor immune response. The activated T-cells upregulate the CTLA-4 and PD-1. PD-1 ligation induces IL-10 production by monocytes, which together with PD-1 inhibits CD4+ T cell responses/activation. This is way for the immune system to use a checkpoint so that immune response does not lead to an autoimmune response. These receptors keeps the immune system in check.

Now in another paper I found this:


If you look at the above micrographs, you will see that the two patients that had relapsed (10710 and 10737) had IL-1b and IL-6 and TNF alpha missing. The macrophages were not activated!!!! The "Danger Signal" known as inflammation was missing! The non-responders most likely had their macrophages polarized to a M2-like phenotype by the Tregs and or IL-10.



So if the Macrophages are M2-like in the Tumor’s microenviroment, then if we control the Tregs, the upregulation of the of CTLA-4, PD-1 on the T-cells including the Tregs, and control the IL-10 production through anti-IL-10 antibody on the macrophages, we can shift the M2-like Macrophages into the M1 thus producing IL-12 shifting the differentiation of the Niave CD4+ T-cell the TH1 phenotype to activate the T-cells.


This all can be done with Yervor, Anti-PD-1 and Anti-IL-10 receptor antibody. You can get the tomor to shed antigentic protein by either whole radiation, Chemotherapy (TMZ- + Patrin-2) or Heat Shock.


CpG oligonucleotides induced NF-_B activation through the triggering of TLR9 signaling in TAM (Fig. 2), and the co-use of an IL-10 receptor Ab reduced IL-10 signaling in TAM, thereby reducing their M2 polarization.



Plasticity of Macrophage Function during Tumor Progression: Regulation by Distinct Molecular Mechanisms
Source: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/180/4/2011.full.pdf

HMGB1 from the dying tumors (irradiation, Chemotherapy, Heat Shock) will act as the Danger signal and bind to the TLR4 and activating the Macrophage (M1) and secrete IL-12 which acts upon the naïve CD4 T helper cells to differentiate to the Th1 phenotype.



petoh et al. has revealed an interesting role of TLR signalling in cancer therapy. They studied the immune-stimulatory properties of dying tumour cells after chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Using TLR4 and MyD88-deficient DCs, they show that TLR4 signaling is required for crosspresentation of antigens from apoptotic tumour cells on MHC class I to generate antitumour cytotoxic T cell (CTL) responses. Apetoh et al.also identified a “danger signal” from dying tumour cells, the nuclear protein highmobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1, see Figure) that triggers this protective immune response through activation of TLR4. According to their work, the interaction of high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) released from dying tumour cells with Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) on dendritic cells is required for the crosspresentation of tumour antigens and the promotion of tumour specific cytotoxic T-cell responses.

So to sum it up, If you take Yervoy + Anti-PD1 + Anti-IL-10 along with radiation/Chemo could we get the right T-cell activation and Immune Response?

My guess you will activate the TLR4 pathway and induce the RIGHT IMMUNE RESPONSE.




So can we Get the Oncologists on board to propose and setup a clinical trial?
Time will only tell.
Remember the this blog. It will lead to a CURE!!!


“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”

~Charles Darwin~

Take Care,

Jimmy B

Identifying and Over Coming Immune Barriers at the Level of the Tumor Microenvironment..Melanoma .Jim Breitfeller

Eleventh International Conference on Progress in Vaccination Against Cancer

Dr. Thomas Gajewski
University of Chicago,Chicago,IL,USA

"Immunotherapeutic approaches for the treatment of melanoma, such as tumor antigen-based vaccines, can frequently boost immune responses. However, clinical responses as measured by tumor shrinkage are seen in only a minority of patients. This observation has prompted careful analysis of the tumor microenvironment for biologic correlates to clinical response and also to identify mechanisms of tumor resistance. Patients with advanced melanoma treated with antigen-specific vaccines had pre-treatment tumor biopsies analyzed by gene expression profiling. Supervised hierarchical clustering was performed based on clinical outcome. An expanded bank of tumors was analyzed to increase the sample size and better understand gene patterns.
Two major categories of melanoma metastases have been observed.

One subgroup of patient has an inflamed phenotype that includes expression of chemokines, T-cell markers, and other immunoregulatory factors. Clinical responders to melanoma vaccines appear to fall within this subset. This group also contains the highest expression of negative regulatory factors, including PD-L1, IDO, and FoxP3, suggesting that these immunosuppressive mechanisms may dominantly inhibit anti-tumor –cell function in those patients. In addition, absence of B7 expression supports classical T-cell anergy. Preclinical experiments have confirmed a critical role for these mechanisms in limiting anti-tumor T–cell efficacy in vivo, giving candidate treatment strategies for translation back into the clinic.

A second subset of patients is represented by tumors which are non-inflamed and lack chemokines for T cell recruitment. Therefore, a major barrier in these cases appears to be failed T –cell migration into tumor sites. Experimental strategies to augment T-cell migration can have important anti-tumor effects in preclinical models. The presence of the "inflamed" gene signature was associated with a type I IFN transcriptional profile, and murine experimental models have confirmed a critical role for type I IFN signaling in promoting adaptive immunity."


So,In the first subset, tumors had a suppresive nature that may be over riddden by Anti-CTLA-4 (Yervoy) and or Anti-PD-1 Therapy

The second subset was missing the "danger signal" inflammatory cytokines and chemoattractants most likely due to STAT3 signaling from the Tumor.

Stimulation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) activates macrophages and results in the release of TNF-alpha. It is hypothesized that melanoma inhibits macrophage activation by suppressing TLR-4 signaling.








Cytokines are small proteins which allow cells of the immune system to communicate with one another via cytokine receptors expressed at the cell surface.
Activated macrophages defend against tumors by secreting cytokines to recruit secondary immune cells, presenting antigen to T cells, and by direct tumor cytotoxicity. Peritoneal macrophages harvested from melanoma-bearing mice are less cytotoxic to melanoma cells, and produce less superoxide, nitric oxide, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) than those from nontumor-bearing mice. Similar impairment of macrophage activation occurs in vitro using media harvested from cultured melanoma cells.

Activated Macrophages secrete the following cytokines under different conditions:
IL-1,IL-12,IL-6, IFN-gamma/alpha/beta and TNF-alpha


IL-6


Interleukin 6 is a pro-inflammatory cytokine and is produced in response to infection and tissue injury. IL-6 exerts its effects on multiple cell types and can act systemically.

IL-6 stimulates liver secretion of acute phase proteins
IL-6 stimulates B-lymphocytes to produce antibodies
IL-6 in concert with IL-1b causes T-cell activation
IL-6 induces STAT 3 Signaling
IL-6 Plus TGF-b induces the Th17 cell phenotype


IL-1 beta

Interleukin-1b is a pro-inflammatory cytokine which is secreted by macrophages activated by a number of stimuli including TNF-alpha, bacterial endotoxin and IL-1b itself.
IL-1b exerts its effects on many different cell types locally at the site of production and systemically (at a distance).


IL-12


Interleukin-12 is a heterodimer consisting of a p35 and a p40 subunit. Both subunits are required for receptor binding and biological activity.
IL-12 stimulates growth of activated Natural Killer (NK) cells, CD8+ and CD4+ T- cells.
IL-12 increases NK and T-cell g-IFN production which shifts T-cell differentiation towards a Th1-type response.
IL-12 increases NK production of TNF-alpha which can act synergistically with IFN-gamma.
IL-12 suppresses IL-4 induced IgE production.


TNF-alpha


Tumor Necrosis Factor alpha is made by many other cells as well as macrophages, which are major sources, especially after priming by Interferon gamma.
TNF-alpha initiates a cascade of cytokines which mediate an inflammatory response. TNF-alpha effects are mediated through two types of receptor, a 75kDa TNFR-a receptor and a 55kDa TNFR-b receptor.
TNF-alpha regulates the expression of many genes in many cell types important for the host response to infection.

IFN-gamma/beta

Macrophages, and many other cells produce these Type I interferons which act as immunomodulatory, as well as antiviral cytokines. Distinct receptor from interferon gamma, mediates overlapping or competing effects on macrophages. Cellular signalling pathways involve Jak/Stats, and other pathways.

So, if Melanoma suppresses Macrophage Activation, then the tumor microenviroment is missing IL-6, IL-1b and other cytokines.

If you look at the above micrographs, you will see that the two patients that had relapsed (10710 and 10737) Had IL-1b and IL-6 missing. The macrophages were not activated!!!! The "Danger Signal" known as inflammation was missing!





The missing combination of IL-1 and IL-6 meant there is no T-cell activation. And no induction of the Th17 phenotype. It is now becoming a lot more clearer based on Dr. Gajewski's findings.


Now might be the time for a critical re-evaluation of our overall approaches to targeting STAT3 and for developing new models for disrupting the protein in order to accomplish the goal of delivering clinically useful direct STAT3 inhibitors as novel anticancer agents in a timely manner.






“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”

~Charles Darwin~
Take Care,
Jimmy B

Tumors shut down the Third Signal needed for T-cell Activation..Melanoma Cancer..Jim Breitfeller

A picture is worth a thousand words.

STAT-3 signaling from the tumors blocks the pro-inflammatory cytokines, so no danger signal is sent to the immune system.




The Missing Link in T-cell activation using a Vaccine, "The Danger Signal"

DCs leads to enhanced induction of Th17-1 cells. These data demonstrate the capacity of DCs to induce expansion of polyfunctional IL17-producing T cells in humans, and suggest a role for DCs in the enrichment of Th17-1 cells in the tumor bed.

Tumor bed is heavily infiltrated by DCs, which, as shown here, are the most efficient inducers of human Th17 cells. The data supports a model in which Th17 cells are recruited to the tumor bed by Th17-attracting chemokines (eg, CCL20, recently shown to be enriched in the melanoma tumor bed) and activated to a Th17 phenotype locally by tumor-infiltrating DCs. The capacity of DCs to induce Th17 cells may be further enhanced by the uptake of apoptotic tumor cells, as well as inflammatory cytokines (eg, IL1, IL6, TNF) in the tumor bed. This gives rise to T-cell activation and the inflamed response leading to immune response.


For the tumor to survive the immunologic suppression system, it must turn on pathways (such as Stat3) that inhibit production or sensing of proinflammatory danger signals that activate innate and adaptive immune responses. Tumors that successfully accomplish this can shift the balance of immunity from activation to tolerance induction. Pardol et al But what if, the production of Proinflammatory cytokines can over come the suppressive function of the tumor’s microenvironment? Could the differentiation of the CD4+ T-cells into Th17 be the path to activation and immunity responses? If that is the case, then Anti-CTLA-4 blockade (ipilimumab) plays more of a major factor in adaptive immunity then we originally thought.




“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”
~Charles Darwin~
Take Care,
Jimmy B

Questions and Answers from Jim In Denver Co..Melanoma..Jim Breitfeller

Jim,
First of all thank you for replying to my post. I usually don’t get many replies. When I talk to my wife about this, within the first five minutes she is telling me “I am loosing her.” It has taken me close to three years to get to where my knowledge on melanoma and the immune system is today. I don’t mean to talk over patient heads. It is just the scientist in me. I worked at Eastman Kodak’s Research laboratories for 25 years.

Now to answer you first question:

You have said that the most effective durable treatment for advanced melanoma would consist of Ipilimumab combined with IL2 - is that correct?

Based on my research today, IL-2 and Anti-CTLA-4 (Ipilimumab) are most durable as we speak. A new phase I therapy is showing great promise with less side effects. That is anti-PD-1 Therapy. These therapies don’t need a specific HLA type to get into the trials.

There is also a very, very ,very new therapy that is still in translational stage. Translational research is a way of thinking about and conducting scientific research to make the results of research applicable to the population under study and is practised in the natural and biological, behavioural, and social sciences. It is usally conduted with animals like rats, mice, monkeys.



Anyway this therapy combines the Anti-CTLA-4 and Anti-PD-1. It has shown synergistic results.



If you have c-Kit or BRAF mutations, then targeted therapy may used but may not be durable.

If you are HLA-02 Positive, You have the option of ACT therapy with Dr. Rosenberg or Dr. Patrick Hwu at NCI or MD Anderson. They have gotten 72 % response rate with I think about 36 % complete response is I am not mistaken.

Second Question:
There are no studies currently availble that combine Ipi and IL2, is that correct?
Define combine? There was a clinical study done by Dr. Rosenberg and colleages.



As you can see in the graph above, IL-2 was added prior to the maximum propagation of the CD4+ T helper cells. IL-2 is known as a growth factor. So what I believe happened in this trial, they grew the Tregs.

IL-2 treatment during the expansion phase was detrimental to the survival of rapidly dividing effector T cells. In contrast, IL-2 therapy was highly beneficial during the death phase, resulting in increased proliferation and survival of Tumor-specific T cells. IL-2 treatment also increased proliferation of resting memory T cells in the host that controlled the disease. A tumor-specific T cell in chronically infected Host also responds to IL-2 resulting in decreased tumor burden. Thus, timing of IL-2 administration and differentiation status of the T cell are critical parameters in designing IL-2 therapies (Blattman et al., 2003).


So what I am trying to say is you do the Ipilimumab therapy first. Wash out for about 50 days, and then start IL-2 Therapy.

Take away: It is a systemic combination with dosing and timing involved. Systemic Combinatorial Therapy.


Question 3:

If someone were to choose to do a combination treatment on their own (i.e. get IL2 following a course of Ipi through one of the clinical trials), would there be an advantage
to starting IL2 as soon as possible after stopping Ipi? Is there a time frame after which there would be no advantage to having received Ipi prior to taking IL2?

Base on papers from ITOH etal and others, 49 days after activation is at the maximum growth phase for the CD8- T-cells that mature into Cytotic T Lymphocytes.

Results: Graph setup

Kinetic Study of rIL-2-induced Expansion. In all 12 metastatic melanomas tested, a substantial proportion of TIL was present in tumor cell suspensions.
The ratio of lymphocytes to tumor cells ranged from 0.03 to 1.25 with an average ratio of 0.40 t 0.37. By fluorescence analysis,
TIL consisted of 78 days 11% CD3
T cells, 33 days 10% CD4+
T cells, 49 days 17% CD8+
Their CD4/CD8 ratio was 0.67.
(ITOH et al., 1988)

It was also reported that there is a time factor involved.
Our results show that T4 + human T cells differ substantially from T8 + cells with respect to their IL-2 responsiveness. T4 + cells cease to proliferate well before T8 + cells during a primary response. (GULLBERG AND SMITH et al.,1986)

Is there a time frame after which there would be no advantage to having received Ipi prior to taking IL2?

Yes, Ipilimumab has a half life of 15 days. So say you get one dose at 3.0 mg/Kg.

Days-- concentration
0-- 3
15-- 1.5
30-- 0.75
45-- 0.375
60-- 0.1875
75-- 0.09375
90-- 0.04687
105-- 0.02343
120-- 0.01171
135-- 0.00587
150-- 0.00292
165-- 0.00146
180-- 0.00073



It gets more complicated when you get multiple doses. Four dose regiment.

Days-- concentration
0-- 3
15-- 1.5
30-- 3.7
45-- 4.85
60-- 5.425
75-- 2.7125
90-- 1.35625
105-- 0.68
120-- 0.34
135-- 0.17
150-- 0.08
165-- 0.04
180-- 0.021

I am not sure where the limited threshold is but, at day 49 you have close to the maximum concentration of Ipilimumab in your body.

Since I used Tremelimumab with Half Life = 21 days and did 15mg/Kg

I had at day 50 approximately 2.17 mg/Kg anti-CTLA-4 level in my body

If I had to venture an educational guess, I would say after a four dose regime, you have 75 days to do the HD IL-2.

To back this theory up, we will use a chart from Dr. Wolchok experience the Ipilimumab.

It is a chart with the Absolute Lymphocyte count. (ALC). It is the CD4+ T-cells and CD8+ T cells combined.




As you can see from the graph, the maximum ALC was about week 7.
Week seven correlates to 49 days. That is when CD8+ T cells are at their maximum growth.



Question 4:

Last, is there any evidence that IL2's efficacy is enhanced by combining it with other agents (i.e. Biochemotherapy), either with or without first receiving Ipi?


This my take on the situation. You need the tumor-specific antigen to presented to the T-cells as signal 1. That could be a vaccine, radiation therapy or chemo to shed the antigen.
Secondly you need the costimulation of the CD28/B7 interface. By using Ipilimumab that blocks the CTLA-4 receptor from binding to the B7 molecule and shutting down the response.
Anti-CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) also blocks the CTLA-4 receptor on the Treg cells subduing their surpress function.

Third you need a “Danger Signal” to get the cell to migrate to the tumor site. This may be done with inflammatory Cytokines like IL2, IL17, IL-1,IL-12,IFN gamma that act directly on the T-cells. This signal was found to optimally activate the Th1 differentiation and lead to the clonal expansion of the T-cells.
It has come to light recently that Ipilimumab helps also in the differentiation by tilting the balance towards Th17 cells. These cells secrete IL-17 which recruite the neutrophils. This all takes place at the tumor’s microenviroment. The neutrophils secrete chemokines that are chemoattractants.

These chemokines, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and MCP-1 are recently reported to serve as chemoattractants for Th1 cells. MIP-1alpha and MCP-1 are also reported to enhance antigen-specific (CTL) Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte induction. Studies revealed that MIP-1alpha /beta released from neutrophils are involved in recruitment of macrophages, T cells, monocytes, dendritic cells (DC), neutrophils and NK cells.
MIP-1 attracts predominantly CD8+ T cells while MIP-1 attracts CD4+ cells, although there is some overlap between subsets in response to both chemokines.
The other Chemokine MCP-1, binds to CCR2 to accumulate monocytes/macrophages, DC, T cells, and NK cells, thereby playing an important role in innate and adaptive immunity. CCR2 is Chemokine receptor that is key determinant of leucocyte trafficking.

IL-2 strongly upregulates expression of CCR2. With the MCP-1/CCR2 interface, the cells can traffic towards the tumor’s microenvironment. The trafficking of the cells and inflammatory cytokines present the perfect storm in the tumor’s microenvironment to induce the right immune response to eradicate the cancer, Melanoma.
So to answer your question, is there any evidence that IL2's efficacy is enhanced by combining it with other agents (i.e. Biochemotherapy), either with or without first receiving Ipi? yes if you know and take a systemic approach. You need to activate the t-cells before introducing IL-2. IL-2 can be the activator for small patient population.

As for Ipilimumab going it alone, like IL-2 can be the activator for small patient population. But when you do a systematic combinatorial therapy, there can be a synergetic result, complete response.
I hope I answered you questions, and please don’t hesitate to ask them. I do all this time by requesting reseach papers from around the world. Each question is a learning tool. There are no stupid questions. Knowledge is power to make an educated decision. Your Life may depend on it. There are many paths to take. Just follow the yellow brick road to complete response.




“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”

~Charles Darwin~
Take Care,
Jimmy B

Dilated capillaries at the melanoma tumor’s microenvironment caused by inflammation cytokines is the beginning of the “Danger Signals”.Jim Breitfeller

Three major events must occur to induce CD8+ T cell–mediated, tumor-protective immunity against melanoma.


First, the T-cell receptor must be triggered by a (or multiple) self antigen–derived peptide MHC class I complex. Therefore, this event depends entirely on appropriate antigen presentation, which is most efficiently provided by mature dendritic cells. Peripherally tolerant or “ignorant” self-reactive T-cell clones, once properly activated, may serve as tumor-specific effector T cells.

Second, simultaneously with T-cell receptor triggering, a distinct second costimulatory signal must be delivered, mediated by IL-2, B7-1, or B7-2, which engage IL-2 receptors and CD28 on the surface of the T cell, respectively (17). A source of these cofactors for effective CD8+ T-cell stimulation can be provided by CD4+ T cells that release critical amounts of IL-2, or by mature dendritic cells that display an increased level of B7-1/B7-2 costimulatory molecules on their cell surfaces.

Third, inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, and IFN-γ provide a third signal that acts directly on T cells, referred to as the “danger signal”. This signal was found to optimally activate TH1 differentiation and lead to clonal expansion of T cells.1




The inflammatory cytokines act to promote T cell responses. They include IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α, and IFN-g produced by macrophages and/or dendritic cells. Th17 cells also plays a part by secreting IL-17 and others. The most notable role of IL-17 is it involvement in inducing and mediating proinflammatory responses. Neutrophils are the earliest cells to arrive at the inflammatory site.

While TGF-β is a critical differentiation factor for Treg cells, IL6 completely inhibits the generation of Treg cells induced by TGF-β. Instead, IL6 and TGF-β together induce the differentiation of pathogenic Th17 cells. With IL-6 missing in the microenvironment, Treg Cells flourish.

If the CD4 + T cells differentiate into TH2 cells that produce IL-4, the other cells inhibited to produce IL-6. IL-4 was found to inhibit TNF-α and IL-1β by activated monocytes almost 100 %. The Secretion of IL-6 was decreased by approximatly 80 % in the presences of IL-4 Cytokine. TE Velde et al 1990


Neutrophil recruitment can also be induced by cytokines such as IL-17 and Tumor necrosis factor (TNF). Among the family of IL-17 cytokines, IL-17A and IL-17F are able
to promote the recruitment of monocytes and neutrophils via the induction of other cytokines and chemokines such as G-CSF and IL-8 by various cell types.

IL-17 appears to be involved in promoting neutrophil influx into the tumor site. With the influx of neutrophils in the tumor’s microenvironment and the inflammatory cytokines, capillaries at the melanoma tumor’s microenvironment become dilated, making room for the recruitment of immune cells.

Neutrophils also play an important role in promoting or suppressing the Th1 immune response, which is mediated partly by induction of cytokines or chemokines. Depending on the compositional makeup of the microenvironment, the neutrophils can promote the right immune response. Studies revealed that these neutrophils secreted three different chemokines. Some of these chemokines are known as chemoattractants. A chemoattractant is a chemical (chemotactic) agent that induces an organism or a cell, a leukocyte, to migrate toward.






These chemokines, MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, and MCP-1 are recently reported to serve as chemoattractants for Th1 cells. MIP-1alpha and MCP-1 are also reported to enhance antigen-specific (CTL) Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte induction. Studies revealed that MIP-1alpha /beta released from neutrophils are involved in recruitment of macrophages, T cells, monocytes, dendritic cells (DC), neutrophils and NK cells.
MIP-1 attracts predominantly CD8+ T cells while MIP-1 attracts CD4+ cells, although there is some overlap between subsets in response to both chemokines.

The other Chemokine MCP-1, binds to CCR2 to accumulate monocytes/macrophages, DC, T cells, and NK cells, thereby playing an important role in innate and adaptive immunity. CCR2 is Chemokine receptor that is key determinant of leucocyte trafficking.
IL-2 strongly upregulates expression of CCR2. With the MCP-1/CCR2 interface, the cells can traffic towards the tumor’s microenvironment. The trafficking of the cells and inflammatory cytokines present the perfect storm in the tumor’s microenvironment to induce the right immune response to eradicate the cancer, Melanoma.






Neutrophils circulate in the bloodstream and must be signaled to leave the bloodstream and enter tissues. The signal often comes from the bacteria themselves, from complement proteins, or from damaged tissue, all of which produce substances that attract neutrophils to a trouble spot. (The process of attracting cells is called chemotaxis.)


The combination of chemoattractants and inflammatory cytokines, in the tumor’s microenvironment, helps to send out a Danger Signal which in turn invokes the right immune response to eradicate the Melanoma tumors.






“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”
~Charles Darwin~

Take Care,

Jimmy B

Unleashing the Immune System to Destroy Melanoma..Jim Breitfeller

Applying dosing schedules to the clinical protocols of combinatorial therapy, we can optimize the clinical outcome 4-14-2010




The Making of an Immune Response using Anti-CTLA-4 Blockade with Interluekin 2

There is one missing link in all of this. The "DANGER SIGNAL"

How do we generate the Danger Signal so our immune system knows that there are foreign invaders (Melanoma Cancer cells)are present? I have been researching this for quite some time now. I call it the "Missing Link". Bristol Myer Squibb thinks that their Ipilimumab can be used as a monotherapy, but they are mistaken. They want you to believe that their drug is doing all the work but behind the sences there is real Biochemistry taking place. Interluekin-2 is one of the most important players in this Orchestra.

In the next couple of weeks I will elaborate on my theory of the Danger Signal and reveal the pieces of the puzzle that i have discovered in my research.

But for now, let the light shine on Ipilimumab, (anti-CTLA-4 blockade) from Bristol Myer Squibb


“It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.”

~Charles Darwin~
Take Care,
Jimmy B

Bcl6 Gene Sculpts Helper T Cell To Boost Antibody Production. Melanoma..Jim Breitfeller

Bcl6 Gene Sculpts Helper T Cell To Boost Antibody Production

Description

Expression of a single gene programs an immune system helper T cell that fuels rapid growth and diversification of antibodies in a cellular structure implicated in autoimmune diseases and development of B cell lymphoma, scientists at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center reported today in Science Express, the advance online publication of the journal Science.

Newswise — Expression of a single gene programs an immune system helper T cell that fuels rapid growth and diversification of antibodies in a cellular structure implicated in autoimmune diseases and development of B cell lymphoma, scientists at The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center reported today in Science Express, the advance online publication of the journal Science.

The gene is Bcl6, which the team found plays the crucial role in differentiating a naïve T cell into a T follicular helper cell (Tfh).

"Tfh cells were first noticed in structures called germinal centers found in the lymphoid system - in lymph nodes and the spleen," said senior author Chen Dong, Ph.D., professor in M. D. Anderson's Department of Immunology. Germinal centers are powerful machines that churn out lots of antibodies.

In the adaptive immune system, B cells present an antigen - a distinctive piece of an invading bacterium or virus - to T cells. The bound antigen converts a naïve T cell to a helper T cell that secretes cytokines which help the B cells expand and produce a large volume of antibodies to destroy an intruder.

Tfh cells are concentrated with B cells in germinal centers, where they play a helper T cell's traditional role in B cell proliferation and antibody development.

"In germinal centers, the B cells not only proliferate but they also undergo hypermutation in their immunoglobulin genes so they can produce a diverse class of antibodies," Dong said. "These mutations also allow production of antibodies with stronger affinity for their target antigens."

There are pitfalls to this process. Tfh cells and germinal centers have been implicated in antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis, Dong noted. In these diseases, the germinal centers are likely producing the wrong type of antibody at great volume.

Genetic hypermutation among B cells in germinal centers creates a hotbed of genomic instability, which gives rise to some types of B cell lymphoma, Dong said.

The scientists set out to understand the role of Bcl6, which is short for B-cell lymphoma 6, a transcription factor previously shown to be selectively expressed in Tfh cells.

Last year, Dong and his colleagues reported in the journal Immunity that cytokines IL-6 and IL-21 drive the differentiation of Tfh cells. However, how these cytokines work had been unclear. In the current study, the team reported that that IL-6 and IL-21 induce expression of Bcl6 in the absence of transforming growth factor beta (TGFß) to drive T cell differentiation into Tfh. "Not only is Bcl6 a transcription factor expressed by Tfh cells, it also has a major function in generating these cells," Dong said.

When TGFß is present with IL-6 and IL-21, T cells differentiate into pro-inflammatory Th17 helper cells.

Another set of experiments showed that Bcl6 expression inhibits a T cell from differentiating into Th17, Th1 or Th2 cells, three other lines of helper cell

Finally, when the Bcl6 gene was knocked out in a mouse model, Tfh was nowhere to be found. "Bcl6 is absolutely required for Tfh generation and it's also important because it blocks other pathways that would lead the T cell into other helper cell types," Dong said.

Solving the molecular programming of Tfh establishes it as the fifth distinct lineage of helper T cell.

Dong and colleagues will continue to characterize Tfh and its relationship to other T helper cells. Dong is co-discoverer of the Th17 cell, which he and colleagues identified as the third T helper cell lineage when conventional wisdom held that there were only two such lines. They also showed that Th17 secretes interleukin-17, which is implicated in both inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Co-authors with Dong are first author Roza I. Nurieva, Ph.D., Yeonseok Chung, Ph.D., Gustavo J. Martinez, Xuexian O. Yang, Ph.D., Shinya Tanaka, Ph.D., Tatyana D. Matskevitch, and Yi-Hong Wang, all of M. D. Anderson's Department of Immunology.

The work is supported by research grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, M. D. Anderson Cancer Center's Center for Targeted Therapy and the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. Martinez is a Schissler Foundation Fellow in cancer research and a student in The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, a joint program of M. D. Anderson and the UT Health Science Center at Houston. Chung has a postdoctoral fellowship grant from the Korea Science and Engineering Foundation. Nurieva is recipient of a Scientist Development Grant from the American Heart Association, and Dong is a Leukemia and Lymphoma Society Scholar and a Trust Fellow of M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.



About M. D. Anderson
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston ranks as one of the world's most respected centers focused on cancer patient care, research, education and prevention. M. D. Anderson is one of only 40 comprehensive cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute. For four of the past six years, including 2008, M. D. Anderson has ranked No. 1 in cancer care in "America's Best Hospitals," a survey published annually in U.S. News & World Report.



These B cells can also help in the attack on the Cancer cells.





Take Care,

Jimmy B

“CD4+ T-regulatory cells: toward therapy for human diseases”Melanoma ..Jim Breitfeller

“CD4+ T-regulatory cells: toward therapy for human diseases”

Thanks to Dr. Megan Levings for taking time out of her busy schedule to email me her research paper on Tregs cells. In my research, I have come to the conclusion that that major barrier to initiating an immune response is over coming the Treg suppression. Remember I said “BLAME IT ON THE TREGS”, well most of the research finding are supporting this piece of the Melanoma Puzzle.

“T-regulatory cells (Tregs) have a fundamental role in the establishment and maintenance of peripheral tolerance. There is now compelling evidence that deficits in the numbers and/or function of different types of Tregs can lead to autoimmunity, allergy, and graft
rejection, whereas an over-abundance of Tregs can inhibit anti-tumor and anti-pathogen immunity.”

“Several different types of Tregs exist in humans, including specialized subsets of CD4+, CD8+, double negative CD3+ CD4-CD8-, alpha /gamma T cells, and natural killer T (NKT) cells. While it is likely that these different types of Tregs work together in a network to maintain immune homeostasis, the majority of current research is focused on defining the normal function of CD4+ Tregs, because these cells mediate dominant, long-lasting, and transferable tolerance in experimental models.”

Levings and colleagues want to harness the Tregs to develop adoptive cellular therapy protocols that would be used in autoimmunity and inflammation. So they wanted to grow the population of Tregs. We on the other hand want to deplete/suppress them, to push the balance towards an immune response.

The Tregs constitute only 1-2 % of the peripheral CD4+ T cells in humans, but is enough to keep the immune system in check. In in-vitro culture conditions, they can expand rapidly when stimulated with an antigen. If you throw Il-2 into the mix, It can increase the cell population by 5-6 fold. This means that the Treg population when activated and Il-2 is secreted or added like (HD IL-2), is now at 10 to 12 % of the population. This can quickly shut down the immune response. So the Takeaway is that one must plan when to introduce the Il-2 to the therapy. So Lets follow nature. Il-2 Is secreted after the CD4+ T cells are activated. THIS MEANS TIMING OF THE IL-2 IS CRUCIAL TO GENERATING A RESPONSE. How Long do we want to hold off before inoculation of the IL-2? We need the growth profiles of each of the CD4+ T cells.

Based on the data gather by Itoh and Colleagues we want to add the Il-2 at the Maximum propagation of the CD8+ T cells. I t has been reported that when the CD8+ T-cells are grown in the presence of Il-2 , they develop in to (CTL) Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes. That is just what we wanted.

This is where Itoh and Colleagues come in:

In 1988, a paper was published “Autologous Tumor Specific Cytotoxic Lymphocytes in the Infiltrate of Human Metastatic Melanomas Activation by Interleukin 2 and Autologous Tumor Cells, and Involvement of the T Cell Receptor “ by Itoh and Colleagues. In their studies, they propagated (TILs) Tumor infiltrate lymphocytes cells from 12 Metastatic Melanoma patients. They preformed kinetic growth studies in IL-2 and even broke it down three Surface markers (CD3, CD4 and CD8).

The results are as follows:
The Total average maximum propagation was 43 days. (N=12)
The average maximum propagation for (lung, Axilla) was 40 days (n=3)

The average maximum propagation for (CD3) was 78 +/- 11 days (n=12)

The average maximum propagation for (CD4) was 33 +/- 10 days (n=12)
The average maximum propagation for CD4 (lung, Axilla) was 26 days (n=3)

The average maximum propagation for (CD8) was 49 +/- 17 days (n=12)
The average maximum propagation for CD8 (lung, Axilla) was 57 days (n=3)

Base on the above data, it would take about 49 days for my activated CD8+ T cells to reach maximum propagation. Then add the IL-2.

The Orchestration of an Inmmune Response Unrehearsed

Source: All Quotes are excerpts from Dr. Megan Levings’s Paper

So now if you put a clinical trial together and follow the timelines,

So now lets see My actual timeline.


They Always said Timing is Everything!!!!!


Take Care,

Jimmy B

Dynamic Regulation of Immune Cell Function During Inflammatory Responses Melanoma Jim Breitfeller

Event Type: Seminar (This is an NIH Science event)

Title: Dynamic Regulation of Immune Cell Function During Inflammatory Responses

Series Name: IIG Seminar Series

Event URL: http://www.videocast.nih.gov

Videocast: Event will be videocast LIVE on the Web

Videocast URL: http://videocast.nih.gov

EVENT DATE/TIME

Date/Time: Wednesday, April 01, 2009 4:15pm - 5:15pm

EVENT SPEAKER(S)

Name: Jackson Egen
Title: Staff Scientist
Organization: NIAID; Lymphocyte Biology Section
City/Province: Bethesda
State: Maryland
Country: USA




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EVENT SPONSOR(S)

Organization(s): [NIH] Immunology Interest Group

Jimmy B

Time to do a Road Show!! Melanoma..Jim Breitfeller

I am in the process of writng to Medarex and Dr. Roesnberg at NCI. I 've been data mining on the internet and I have been able to piece a sound theory together. It has taken me over a year to put all the pieces together. I started at the edges and worked my way across the board. I am putting the final pieces in and it is my belief that I found a needle in the hay stack. It may not be the only way to get to a stabilization, but I think I am on the "Yellow brick road". Now it is time to see the great Wizard of OZ, Dr. Rosenberg. I hope He will give a thumbs up (Brain).

So I am off to see the Wizard.


And in the previous post this graph shows when the innate immune response should take place by a natural antibody. Check out the timeline. The maximum response is at about two weeks. My Inflamoratory response happen in 15 days.

This is not a coincidence!!!!!!!


Wish me luck

Jimmy B

Pinpointing when T cell costimulatory receptor CTLA-4 is Engaged!!!! Melanoma..Jim Breitfeller

Pinpointing when T cell costimulatory receptor CTLA-4 Is Engaged. In my therapy, I am trying to follow what had transpired and to try to back the findings up with scientific facts.

So, after the inoculation of the 15mg/Kg of Tremelimumab (from Pfizer) IgG2 what happened? Based on scientific theory the Monoclonal antibody blocks the CTLA-4 receptor causing the T-cell to stay active. So If my body’s chemistry is right, when and how do we know if the CTLA-4 blockage is engaged?

Dr. James Allison and colleagues in the late 1990’s did some studies with mice. In the mouse model, the anti-CTLA-4 blockage caused an autoimmune response which was diabetes in the mice. Before I go any further, I must make a note of caution. That is not all immune responses in mice models crossover to the human model, but the models are usually a good predictor. So with that said, In the research paper “Pinpointing when the T-cell costimulatory receptor CTLA-4 must be engaged to dampen diabetogenic T-cells”, it took about 12 days to see a response to the Anti-CTLA-4 mAb.

Source: http://www.pnas.org/content/97/22/12204.full

Pinpointing when the T-cell costimulatory receptor CTLA-4 must be engaged to dampen diabetogenic T-cells



Well in my therapy, an inflammatory response was noted on day 15. This suggests that the costimulatory receptor was fully engage to cause a inflammatory response, The “Danger Signal”

“Three major events must occur to induce CD8+ T cell–mediated, tumor-protective immunity against syngeneic melanoma. First, the T-cell receptor must be triggered by a (or multiple) self antigen–derived peptide MHC class I complex (7–13). Therefore, this event depends entirely on appropriate antigen presentation, which is most efficiently provided by mature dendritic cells (14). Peripherally tolerant or “ignorant” self-reactive T-cell clones, once properly activated, may serve as tumor-specific effector T cells (15, 16). Second, simultaneously with T-cell receptor triggering, a distinct second costimulatory signal must be delivered, mediated by IL-2, B7-1, or B7-2, which engage IL-2 receptors and CD28 on the surface of the T cell, respectively (17). A source of these cofactors for effective CD8+ T-cell stimulation can be provided by CD4+ T cells that release critical amounts of IL-2, or by mature dendritic cells that display an increased level of B7-1/B7-2 costimulatory molecules on their cell surfaces. Third, inflammatory cytokines, including IL-1, IL-6, IL-12, and IFN-γ provide a third signal that acts directly on T cells (18), referred to as the “danger signal” (19, 20). This signal was found to optimally activate TH1 differentiation and lead to clonal expansion of T cells (18).”

Source: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=300854

Next Slide Please!!!!!!! Melanoma Jim Breitfeller

BobbyO L, This Slide for You!!!!!!


Follow the "YELLOW BRICK ROAD!!!!!"


Cell-mediated immunity is an immune response that does not involve antibodies or complement but rather involves the activation of macrophages, natural killer cells (NK), antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL), and the release of various cytokines in response to an antigen. Historically, the immune system was separated into two branches: humoral immunity, for which the protective function of immunization could be found in the humor (cell-free bodily fluid or serum) and cellular immunity, for which the protective function of immunization was associated with cells. CD4 cells or helper T cells provide protection against different pathogens.
Cellular immunity protects the body by:

1. activating antigen-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocytes(CTL)that are able to induce apoptosis in body cells displaying epitopes of foreign antigen on their surface, such as virus-infected cells, cells with intracellular bacteria, and cancer cells displaying tumor antigens;

2. activating macrophages and natural killer cells, enabling them to destroy intracellular pathogens; and

3. stimulating cells to secrete a variety of cytokines that influence the function of other cells involved in adaptive immune responses and innate immune responses.
Cell-mediated immunity is directed primarily at microbes that survive in phagocytes and microbes that infect non-phagocytic cells. It is most effective in removing virus-infected cells, but also participates in defending against fungi, protozoans, cancers, and intracellular bacteria. It also plays a major role in transplant rejection.

Source: Wikipedia

And Who says I study the dictionary?????

Jimmy B